Netanyahu Strikes Iran Amidst Corruption Trial

Conservatives around Australia appear to be divided on the issue of the Israel-Iran conflict. Not only is it a complex war that has been brewing for decades, but because the propaganda game is strong and people are looking to different sources of news, there is disunity amongst political advocates and commentators who would otherwise agree on political facts.

Few are tackling the issue with any real depth within Australia, although American commentary is lively, particularly because Trump was voted in for being a ‘No New War’ president. Now the nation faces the decision of whether it will be involved in offensive combat in an entirely new regime change war in the Middle East. Commentators such as Jack Posobiec, a former Navy intelligence officer as well as Steve Bannon, Trump’s former white house chief strategist, are offering detailed insights into the war that contradict much of what the ‘moderate’ faction within the Republican party are suggesting. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green also was dubious that Iran indeed has nukes it was prepared to use anytime soon. Although it is not popular amongst conservatives currently to indicate Iran is not the aggressor, it is important to look at the facts in warfare, and not do things based on mere emotion. Of course the Iranian regime needs to shift and terrorist ideals need to be squashed (conservatives all agree here), but this must be handled with strategy and one cannot be strategic without properly consulting the evidence…

Candace Owens, who Australia banned in a shocking visa decision that became a High Court

issue, has also offered her own episode on the topic as she sits down to discuss her insights alongside Ian Carrol, an American patriot, who recently posted a video promoting the Bibi Documentary; a comprehensive expose on the alleged corruption of Israel’s prime minister.

Although not every conservative agrees with the Candace Owens Show, it is important to note that Australia cancelled her visa, despite her being a prominent and valued commentator with 4.3 million subscribers on YouTube. The fact is, whenever the establishment tries hard to censor particular voices, they have a track record of actually doing damage to democracy or suppressing the truth. What is the point of defending a democracy in the middle east, if

democracy is not even functioning right here at home?

Candace Owens and other activists who are exposing Netanyahu, have been labelled ‘anti-semitic’. Is criticising Scott Morrison during the pandemic, or exposing corruption within Australia, ‘anti-Australian’? The same logic applies when it comes to Israel. It is true that Israel

is facing incredible hostility at the moment from Islamic forces that surround the region, and of course we should strive to protect this democracy, but we must do it strategically. If our ally, the United States, is reluctant to get involved in offensive combat for Israel, which it has financially backed for several years, then this speaks volumes. Not only is it dangerous for nations to start justifying pre-emptive strikes on others, and calling offensive war ‘self-defense,’ but it is unreasonable to strike at facilities before accurate evidence surfaces to be justifying new wars.

Trump was scheduled to negotiate with Iran on the Sunday following the strikes. Trump also

stated the following: “I don’t want them [Israel] going in because, I mean, that would blow it.’

The other question hovering over the pre-emptive strikes that not enough are talking about, is

the fact these nuclear facilities were largely impenetrable, with some being built into mountainous terrain or several metres underground - some estimate 80-100m. Of course some damage occurred to these facilities but they were largely surface level ‘scratches’ in the scheme of things. Was it strategic to bomb these locations using airstrikes, alerting Iran to the fact you’re coming after their nuclear program, plus fail to do any real or irreversible damage? Was it strategic to attempt this before even consulting the United States of America, your largest and most financially stable ally?

Not everyone appears to be a fan of escalated warfare, rising WW3 tensions, and getting behind the nation of Israel in offensive combat, without first assessing the facts, and several are dubious as to Netanyahu’s ability to secure Israel and present us with facts. Not only did he lose significant support over October 7 which Israel’s defence systems failed to stop, but just days ago, his parliament nearly dissolved and his term as PM could have come to an abrupt and bitter end. With war escalating rapidly, people across the world are hovering an investigative lens over Netanyahu, and not all is as fantastic as it seems.

Netanyahu is listed on the World Economic Forum website, indicating he is in line with their policies and supports their platform and advocacy efforts to ‘own nothing and be happy.’

Netanyahu has also pushed for Net Zero, and fallen for the ‘global warming’ political narrative

which the left and China have been using to sell renewables to the world with kill switches. He

has been diplomatic with Bill Gates, and jabbed his population during the pandemic. In fact when he sealed a deal with Pfizer, the Israeli ombudsman asked him why he did not involve the ‘corona cabinet.’ He appeared to have made the decision himself. It appears Netanyahu is

actually bent on running Israel like a dictatorship. Significant protests are happening across Israel to have him step down as leader.

Not only are some of his actions questionable, but his affiliations are interesting, particularly his allegiance to senior Blackrock advisor, Stanley Fischer (now deceased), who also held positions with the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the Federal Reserve. In 2005, Netanyahu (then finance minister) recommended Fischer as head of Bank of Israel. What is also not talked about enough by conservatives (particularly in Australia) is that Netanyahu has been indicted, and with pretty serious charges. He was indicted for breach of trust, accepting bribes and fraud. His hearing began in October 2019. He submitted an immunity request as Prime Minister, and received public opprobrium for it. There have also been several attempts to postpone his testimony. Netanyahu’s cross examination began on the 3rd of June 2025. He felt ‘sick’ also during his testimony, leading to an adjournment. His trial has been fraught with suspicious delays. On the agenda for case 1000 was Netanyahu’s relationship with Australia’s billionaire James Packer and Hollywood’s Arnon Milchan, another billionaire. Amidst all this, Netanyahu has struck Iran, and Israel has gone into emergency mode securing Netanyahu’s leadership for longer than Israel seems to want to put up with it…

It is evident to anyone paying close attention that there is far more to this war than meets the eye. America does not wish to engage, and without their support, Israel will likely fail against its offensive attack to take out Israel’s control and command, plus do permanent damage to Iran’s nuclear facilities. To be successful in war you generally need willing allies, support from other nations as well as your own, plus a leader that is not allegedly corrupt. Israel is failing on all fronts currently, and the civilians are yet again, first to suffer at the hands of political forces.

Israel’s best bet currently, may be to attempt to elect a much more strategic and non-corrupted leader to take them through this catastrophe, to achieve the least amount of collateral for innocent civilians all around.