Greta Thunberg Sails to Gaza

Greta Thunberg, the 22 year old UN backed Swedish climate activist, set sail for Gaza this

June, in the middle of an embroiled conflict. She and her ‘Freedom Flotilla Coalition’ were

intercepted and deported with ease, by Israeli forces. It is reported that on board her boat to

Gaza, Thunberg was carrying ‘symbolic’ amounts of aid. She was on board the ‘Madleen Ship’

on a journey that was inevitably headed for disaster.

Israel blocked Thunberg’s efforts and offered her an October 7 documentary to view, which she refused to watch. She instead released a video reporting her ‘kidnapping’ by the Israeli defence forces. She directly got in the way of their line of attack, since she and 11 other activists were sailing for a contested sea strip. Their efforts were a feeble attempt to stop Israel from controlling the site. Since when were people barely passed the age of teen years, dragged into serious navy wars with little to no experience? Thunberg is a climate activist. Now the globalist backed legacy media is attempting to sell us all the narrative that she is the next Gen Z warlord.

She has been sent packing via fossil fuel powered plane, leaving the world to catch up to what this swift stunt is really all about…

According to the Conflict and Environmental Observatory, military combat is responsible for

5.5% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. Sea warfare can be incredibly pollutive as waste products from vessels seep into the delicate ecosystem. Greta, the environmental advocate, is now being dragged headfirst into marine combat, wearing the Hamas flag around her neck, as captured in photos.

It is a joke - except nobody is laughing.

Thunberg rose to prominence as a mascot of the worldwide ‘climate alarmist’ clan ever since

she began skipping school in a phenomenon that became the ‘school strike for climate.’

Wagging youth are now telling the world the environment will collapse unless we all adopt Net Zero (except for China), and buy renewables which are manufactured with fossil fuels. The

latest election in Australia has demonstrated that climate alarmism is a growing ‘concern’ for

many as several Climate 200 backed candidates performed well in the polls, even beating some major party candidates. Not many people however, approach environmental issues with any particular concerns surrounding national security or military considerations but the truth is, the environment is not going to be salvaged in the middle of ongoing global conflicts which affect economies, pollutive output, food and agricultural security as well as healthcare.

Environmental policies collapse in the middle of global emergencies. Virtue signalling is therefore not the way to sustain the environment. Sustaining the environment long term comes with shrewdness in political and military situations.

Several Climate 200 candidates backed by Australia’s son of a billionaire, Simon Holmes A

Court, were pushing for Chinese renewables during the Australian federal election. Court also

visited China and CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited) to assess business

dealings. On January 7th, The US Department of Defense named CATL as a Chinese military

company. It was therefore blacklisted. When asked questions during the election about their ties to Chinese battery companies linked to the Communist military, many climate alarmist

candidates remained silent.

It appears that climate alarmists and pro-renewable types, are often not the greatest war and

defence strategists.

The Chinese Communist Party has been accused of planting ‘kill switches’ in solar farms. It

seems that pro-renewables activists are bad news when it comes to national security, so the

fact they are now gearing up to get on the frontlines of middle eastern conflict to fight for the

‘terrorist side,’ is nothing short of lunacy - although it is hardly a shock.

Greta Thunberg ‘belongs’ to the United Nations as she is one of their leading advocates, as an international icon for the UN Climate Action Summit. The United Nations have often been

accused of being deliberately pro China, as it has continually left out Taiwan as a member.

UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees) has also fired 9 staff for direct links to the October 7 attacks in Israel, lead by Hamas terrorists.

If NGOs and activists wish to provide genuine aid, then they need to be practical, not merely

‘symbolic’ with their efforts. Aid should be delivered to trusted NGOs with no links to Palestinian terrorists. The problem here is that the vast majority of Palastinians are pro Hamas. Foundation for Defense of Democracies indicates support for Hamas amongst Palestinians remains very high.

This begs the question as to why Greta Thunberg is being used like a pawn to rally support for the Palestine side. What good will this do for the environment? She will merely prolong and escalate greater global conflict. Her strategy is a weak one, and will likely cause more harm than good, particularly in times where talks of nuclear weaponisation are emerging amongst leaders due to heightened transnational tensions.

According to the NGO, Christian Faith and Freedom Inc, there is an estimated 600 Christians in Gaza currently. To provide genuine humanitarian aid requires understanding the people most in need of resources. People in Gaza who face some of the most violent persecution due to their beliefs which are contrary to pro-Hamas supporters, require strategic and priority aid. Aid should be channeled through trusted sources, using mutual and well-developed networks, and it should be going to people who need it the most; namely Christians in the region currently who not only face attacks from the war, but attacks from the community surrounding them. NGOs delivering genuine aid to war ravaged regions, can spot publicity stunts from a mile away and Greta Thunberg’s ‘Freedom Flotilla’ is likely one of those publicity stunts. Rather than helping the situation, she is likely to merely get in the way of serious conflict, add foreigners to the death toll and escalate global tensions.

De-escalating military tension, not increasing it, is what people who are genuinely pro the

environment strive towards. Thunberg is being used like a chess piece by the globalists and

many, including Generation Z - which Thunberg appeals to the most - are unfortunately likely to fall for it, unless they dig deeper into the facts.